Opteron X2 185 vs Pentium 4 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3542not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiency0.07no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MDenmark (2005−2006)
Release dateno data6 March 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$435

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data199 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketPLGA775939
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185 are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 110 Watt

Pentium 4 630 has 31% lower power consumption.

Opteron X2 185, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

We couldn't decide between Intel Pentium 4 630 and AMD Opteron X2 185. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 185 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
AMD Opteron X2 185
Opteron X2 185

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 136 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Opteron X2 185 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 4 630 and Opteron X2 185, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.