Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Pentium 4 630
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Pentium 4 630 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3300 | 3083 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | Intel Core 2 Duo |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | 3.34 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott 2M | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | no data | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.2V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PLGA775 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.35 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 10 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 105.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 740% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 630 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Core 2 Duo SU7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
