Celeron D 335 vs Pentium 4 630

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesPentium 4no data
Power efficiency0.17no data
Architecture codenamePrescott 2MPrescott (2001−2005)
Release dateno dataJune 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cacheno data256 KB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data109 mm2
Maximum core temperature67 °C67 °C
Number of transistorsno data125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4V1.25V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPLGA775PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States--
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 73 Watt

Pentium 4 630 has 100% more threads.

Celeron D 335, on the other hand, has 15.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and Celeron D 335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 4 630
Pentium 4 630
Intel Celeron D 335
Celeron D 335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 127 votes

Rate Pentium 4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 28 votes

Rate Celeron D 335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 4 630 or Celeron D 335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.