3020e vs Pentium 4 630
Aggregate performance score
3020e outperforms Pentium 4 630 by a whopping 788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 630 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3313 | 2180 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | 23.97 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott 2M | Dali (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | no data | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 630 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 1.2V-1.4V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 630 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | PLGA775 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 630 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium 4 630 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 630 and 3020e are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 630 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 1.51 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 84 Watt | 6 Watt |
3020e has a 788.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.
The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 630 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 630 is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 630 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
