Ryzen 5 8640HS vs Pentium 4 560
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8640HS outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a whopping 6019% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3214 | 601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.23 | 43.43 |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data | 6 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 775 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 12.85 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 88 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8640HS has a 6019% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 214.3% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 8640HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 560 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 8640HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 560 and Ryzen 5 8640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
