Celeron 827E vs Pentium 4 560
Aggregate performance score
Celeron 827E outperforms Pentium 4 560 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3502 | 3468 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.32 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Prescott (2001−2005) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $89 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 560 and Celeron 827E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 14 |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 109 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 125 million | 504 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 560 and Celeron 827E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 775 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 MB | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 4 560 and Celeron 827E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 4 560 and Celeron 827E are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 4 560 and Celeron 827E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3-1066 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.19 | 0.21 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 1 Watt | 17 Watt |
Pentium 4 560 has 1600% lower power consumption.
Celeron 827E, on the other hand, has a 10.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron 827E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 560 in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 560 is a desktop processor while Celeron 827E is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
