EPYC 7532 vs Pentium 3825U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3825U
2015, $161
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.80
EPYC 7532
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
28.98
+3523%

EPYC 7532 outperforms Pentium 3825U by a whopping 3523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2887205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.256.11
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date1 March 2015 (11 years ago)19 February 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium 3825U 0.80
EPYC 7532 28.98
+3523%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium 3825U 1402
Samples: 246
EPYC 7532 50765
+3521%
Samples: 47

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3825U 343
EPYC 7532 1148
+235%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3825U 701
EPYC 7532 10001
+1327%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 28.98
Recency 1 March 2015 19 February 2020
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Pentium 3825U has 1233% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7532, on the other hand, has a 3523% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7532 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 3825U in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 3825U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7532 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 88 votes

Rate Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7532 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 3825U and EPYC 7532, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.