Celeron G1630 vs Pentium 3825U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3825U
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.87
Celeron G1630
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.07
+23%

Celeron G1630 outperforms Pentium 3825U by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25762439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency5.531.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size82 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3825U 0.87
Celeron G1630 1.07
+23%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3825U 1399
Celeron G1630 1707
+22%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3825U 339
Celeron G1630 504
+48.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3825U 689
Celeron G1630 937
+36%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 1.07
Recency 1 March 2015 1 September 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Pentium 3825U has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G1630, on the other hand, has a 23% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron G1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3825U in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 3825U is a notebook processor while Celeron G1630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3825U and Celeron G1630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
Intel Celeron G1630
Celeron G1630

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 73 votes

Rate Pentium 3825U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate Celeron G1630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3825U or Celeron G1630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.