Ultra 7 258V vs Pentium 3805U
Aggregate performance score
Core Ultra 7 258V outperforms Pentium 3805U by a whopping 1558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2655 | 615 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.68 | 68.50 |
Architecture codename | Broadwell-U (2015) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 1 March 2015 (9 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1168 | Intel BGA 2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors | Arc 140V |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.77 | 12.77 |
Recency | 1 March 2015 | 24 September 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 17 Watt |
Pentium 3805U has 13.3% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 258V, on the other hand, has a 1558.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
The Core Ultra 7 258V is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 3805U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3805U and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.