EPYC 75F3 vs Pentium 3556U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3556U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.61
EPYC 75F3
2021, $4,860
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
36.86
+5943%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Pentium 3556U by a whopping 5943% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3080114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.39
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.725.55
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (12 years ago)15 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data29.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm+
Die size118 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1168SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes10128
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium 3556U 0.61
EPYC 75F3 36.86
+5943%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium 3556U 1063
Samples: 187
EPYC 75F3 64505
+5968%
Samples: 3

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium 3556U 309
EPYC 75F3 1721
+457%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium 3556U 524
EPYC 75F3 14336
+2636%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 36.86
Recency 1 September 2013 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 280 Watt

Pentium 3556U has 1767% lower power consumption.

EPYC 75F3, on the other hand, has a 5943% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 214% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 3556U in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 3556U is a notebook processor while EPYC 75F3 is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 152 votes

Rate Pentium 3556U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 3556U and EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.