Xeon 6315P vs Pentium 2020M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 2020M
2012, $134
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.81
Xeon 6315P
2025, $213
4 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
6.70
+727%

Xeon 6315P outperforms Pentium 2020M by a whopping 727% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28821242
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0722.53
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Pentiumno data
Power efficiency0.985.14
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
Release date1 September 2012 (13 years ago)24 February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$213

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6315P has 32086% better value for money than Pentium 2020M.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Threads24
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size118 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium 2020M 0.81
Xeon 6315P 6.70
+727%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Pentium 2020M 1413
Samples: 933
Xeon 6315P 11721
+730%
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 6.70
Recency 1 September 2012 24 February 2025
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Pentium 2020M has 57% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6315P, on the other hand, has a 727% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6315P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 2020M in performance tests.

Be aware that Pentium 2020M is a notebook processor while Xeon 6315P is a server/workstation one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 962 votes

Rate Pentium 2020M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 327 votes

Rate Xeon 6315P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium 2020M and Xeon 6315P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.