C-60 vs PRO A4-8350B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

PRO A4-8350B
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96
+433%

PRO A4-8350B outperforms C-60 by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27083517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.582.14
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date29 September 2015 (10 years ago)22 August 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A4-8350B and C-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size245 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A4-8350B and C-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A4-8350B and C-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A4-8350B and C-60 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A4-8350B and C-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3 Single-channel
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6290
iGPU core count4no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A4-8350B and C-60 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A4-8350B and C-60 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A4-8350B and C-60.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

PRO A4-8350B 0.96
+433%
C-60 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

PRO A4-8350B 1690
+435%
Samples: 14
C-60 316
Samples: 457

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.18
Recency 29 September 2015 22 August 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 9 Watt

PRO A4-8350B has a 433.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

C-60, on the other hand, has 622.2% lower power consumption.

The AMD PRO A4-8350B is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-60 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A4-8350B is a desktop processor while C-60 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A4-8350B
PRO A4-8350B
AMD C-60
C-60

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate PRO A4-8350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 256 votes

Rate C-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors PRO A4-8350B and C-60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.