Celeron 4305UE vs PRO A12-8870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-8870
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.16
+125%
Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96

PRO A12-8870 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20482706
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.02
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency3.576.88
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release dateOctober 2016 (9 years ago)1 October 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610
iGPU core count8no data
Enduron/a-
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

PRO A12-8870 2.16
+125%
Celeron 4305UE 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

PRO A12-8870 3809
+124%
Samples: 38
Celeron 4305UE 1699
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.16 0.96
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

PRO A12-8870 has a 125% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD PRO A12-8870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Note that PRO A12-8870 is a desktop processor while Celeron 4305UE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-8870
PRO A12-8870
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 232 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors PRO A12-8870 and Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.