A4-6320 vs PRO A10-8850B

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8850B
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.36
+146%
A4-6320
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

PRO A10-8850B outperforms A4-6320 by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17972501
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.351.40
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date29 September 2015 (9 years ago)December 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,303 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1600
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
iGPU core count8no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512128
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8850B 2.36
+146%
A4-6320 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8850B 3752
+145%
A4-6320 1530

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.36 0.96
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

PRO A10-8850B has a 145.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A4-6320, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The PRO A10-8850B is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8850B and A4-6320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8850B
PRO A10-8850B
AMD A4-6320
A4-6320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25 votes

Rate PRO A10-8850B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate A4-6320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8850B or A4-6320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.