i5-4300M vs PRO A10-8770E

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770E
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.92
+2.1%
Core i5-4300M
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.88

PRO A10-8770E outperforms Core i5-4300M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19541978
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency5.174.79
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$227

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size250 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCPGA946
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 4600
iGPU core count6no data
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Switchable graphics+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPortn/a+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data3840x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data2880x1800@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1211.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M.

PCIe version3.03
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770E 1.92
+2.1%
i5-4300M 1.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770E 3036
+2.3%
i5-4300M 2968

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

PRO A10-8770E 575
i5-4300M 958
+66.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

PRO A10-8770E 1306
i5-4300M 1855
+42%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.92 1.88
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 37 Watt

PRO A10-8770E has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores, and 5.7% lower power consumption.

i5-4300M, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M.

Note that PRO A10-8770E is a desktop processor while Core i5-4300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770E and Core i5-4300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770E
PRO A10-8770E
Intel Core i5-4300M
Core i5-4300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 240 votes

Rate Core i5-4300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770E or Core i5-4300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.