Xeon E5-1603 vs PRO A10-8770

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.25
+3.2%
Xeon E5-1603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
2.18

PRO A10-8770 outperforms Xeon E5-1603 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18171837
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.281.59
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)no data
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cacheno data10 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data64 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data0.6V - 1.35V

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data375 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidthno data31.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770 2.25
+3.2%
Xeon E5-1603 2.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770 3574
+3.2%
Xeon E5-1603 3463

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 2.18
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

PRO A10-8770 has a 3.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603.

Note that PRO A10-8770 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-1603 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770 and Xeon E5-1603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770
Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770 or Xeon E5-1603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.