A8-6500 vs PRO A10-8750B

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1876	1893
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.19	0.34
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Godaveri (2014−2018)	Richland (2013−2014)
Release date	29 September 2015 (8 years ago)	1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price	$190	$58

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-6500 has 79% better value for money than PRO A10-8750B.

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	4.1 GHz
L1 cache	no data	192 KB
L2 cache	4096 KB	4096 KB
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	245 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	72 °C	71 °C
Number of transistors	2,411 million	1,178 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	no data	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FM2+	FM2
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	1
FMA	+	FMA4
AVX	+	AVX
FRTC	1	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	-
PowerNow	+	+
PowerGating	+	+
Out-of-band client management	+	-
VirusProtect	+	+
RAID	+	no data
HSA	1	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-2133	DDR3-1866
Max memory channels	2	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	AMD Radeon HD 8570D
iGPU core count	8	no data
Number of pipelines	512	256
Enduro	+	+
Switchable graphics	1	1
UVD	+	+
VCE	+	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	+
HDMI	+	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	DirectX® 11
Vulkan	1	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8750B outperforms A8-6500 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.86	1.82
Integrated graphics card		1.14
Recency	29 September 2015	1 June 2013
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8750B and A8-6500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---