i7-980 vs Opteron 6281
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6281 outperforms Core i7-980 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1540 | 1601 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | 1.28 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Gulftown (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 26 June 2011 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $988 | $1,109 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Opteron 6281 has 24% better value for money than i7-980.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.33 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4.8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 239 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 1,170 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 24 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-980.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.13 | 3.91 |
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 26 June 2011 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
Opteron 6281 has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Opteron 6281 and Intel Core i7-980.
Be aware that Opteron 6281 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-980 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
