i7-965 Extreme Edition vs Opteron 6281
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1541 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7EE |
| Power efficiency | 3.40 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Nehalem (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 1 May 2012 (13 years ago) | 17 November 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $988 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | QPI |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 24 |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per module) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 2x 315 mm2 | 263 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | 731 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | G34 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 24 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6281 and Core i7-965 Extreme Edition.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2012 | 17 November 2008 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Opteron 6281 has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 6281 and Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 6281 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-965 Extreme Edition is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
