EPYC 9375F vs Opteron 3380

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1716not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.79no data
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)Turin (2024)
Release date4 December 2012 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache384 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 December 2012 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 8 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Opteron 3380 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 3380 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron  3380
Opteron 3380
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5 votes

Rate Opteron 3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 3380 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.