Atom C3508 vs Opteron 3365

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 3365
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
2.32
+123%

Opteron 3365 outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19612621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.513.91
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameDelhi (2012−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release dateJune 2013 (12 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache384 KB224 KB
L2 cache4 MB8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 3365 2.32
+123%
Atom C3508 1.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 3365 4083
+123%
Samples: 32
Atom C3508 1831
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 1.04
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 11 Watt

Opteron 3365 has a 123.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 490.9% lower power consumption.

The AMD Opteron 3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 3365
Opteron 3365
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Opteron 3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 3365 and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.