Atom C3508 vs Opteron 6282 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6282 SE
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
3.63
+249%

Opteron 6282 SE outperforms Atom C3508 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16262622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.18no data
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.103.91
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)15 August 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,090no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache768 KB224 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per module)8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size2x 315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketG34FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt11.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 1866
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanesno data8
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data8
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 6282 SE 3.63
+249%
Atom C3508 1.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 6282 SE 6385
+249%
Samples: 2
Atom C3508 1831
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.63 1.04
Recency 14 November 2011 15 August 2017
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 11 Watt

Opteron 6282 SE has a 249% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom C3508, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1172.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD Opteron 6282 SE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom C3508 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6282 SE
Opteron 6282 SE
Intel Atom C3508
Atom C3508

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 10 votes

Rate Opteron 6282 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3508 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 6282 SE and Atom C3508, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.