Xeon 6776P vs Opteron 250
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3463 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.11 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | no data |
| Release date | December 2004 (21 years ago) | 1 April 2025 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 336 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 250 and Xeon 6776P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 1 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 350 Watt |
Opteron 250 has 293% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6776P, on the other hand, has 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 250 and Intel Xeon 6776P. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
