Opteron 144 vs Opteron 250
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 250 outperforms Opteron 144 by a whopping 106% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3266 | 3505 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | December 2004 (20 years ago) | June 2003 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | $65 |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 250 and Opteron 144 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 250 and Opteron 144 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 85 Watt |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.37 | 0.18 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 85 Watt |
Opteron 250 has a 105.6% higher aggregate performance score.
Opteron 144, on the other hand, has 4.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD Opteron 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 144 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
