Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Opteron 248
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Opteron 248 by a whopping 4537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3366 | 665 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 0.13 | 18.90 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025) |
| Release date | November 2003 (21 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 233 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 880M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.27 | 12.52 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a 4537% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 217.9% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 248 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 248 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
