Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Opteron 248

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 248
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.27
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
2025
8 cores / 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c threads, 28 Watt
12.58
+4559%

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 outperforms Opteron 248 by a whopping 4559% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3354650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiency0.1318.99
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release dateNovember 2003 (21 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$12no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size193 mm2233 mm2
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket940FP8
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 880M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Opteron 248 0.27
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 12.58
+4559%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Opteron 248 476
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 22103
+4543%
Samples: 141

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 12.58
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has a 4559.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 217.9% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 248 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 248 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 248
Opteron 248
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 248 and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.