Itanium 9720 vs Opteron 248
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3562 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.09 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | no data |
| Release date | November 2003 (22 years ago) | 1 April 2017 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.73 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | 940 | LGA1248 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| VT-i | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 248 and Itanium 9720. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
| Threads | 1 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 130 Watt |
Opteron 248 has 46% lower power consumption.
Itanium 9720, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 248 and Intel Itanium 9720. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
