Xeon 6960P vs Opteron 148
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Granite Rapids (2024) |
| Release date | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 144 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 112 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 432 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 115 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 80 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 939 | 7529 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 500 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 96 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 August 2005 | 24 September 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 72 |
| Threads | 1 | 144 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 500 Watt |
Opteron 148 has 488.2% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6960P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, 7100% more physical cores and 14300% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 148 and Xeon 6960P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
