EPYC 7D13 vs Opteron 148
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3487 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.11 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 2 August 2005 (20 years ago) | 10 November 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 36 |
| Threads | 1 | 72 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 192 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 115 mm2 | 6x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 24,900 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 939 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 148 and EPYC 7D13.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 29 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 August 2005 | 10 November 2021 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 36 |
| Threads | 1 | 72 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron 148 has 12% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7D13, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 3500% more physical cores and 7100% more threads, and a 1757% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 148 and AMD EPYC 7D13. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
