Duron 950 vs Opteron 148

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3423not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Duron
Power efficiency0.11no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Spitfire (2000−2001)
Release date2 August 2005 (20 years ago)6 June 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Detailed specifications

Opteron 148 and Duron 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.95 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data9.5
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB64 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm180 nm
Die size115 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors114 million25 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 148 and Duron 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket939A
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt42 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 148 and Duron 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2005 6 June 2001
Chip lithography 130 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 42 Watt

Opteron 148 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Duron 950, on the other hand, has 102.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Opteron 148 and AMD Duron 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Opteron 148 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 950 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 148
Opteron 148
AMD Duron 950
Duron 950

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 148 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Duron 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Opteron 148 and Duron 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.