EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Opteron 146

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3204not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.23no data
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Siena (2023−2024)
Release dateSeptember 2003 (21 year ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads196
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die size193 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors106 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket940SP6
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 48
Threads 1 96
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 200 Watt

Opteron 146 has 124.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 146 and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 146
Opteron 146
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Opteron 146 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 146 or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.