EPYC 9825 vs N200
Primary details
Comparing N200 and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1599 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 50.63 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $13,006 |
Detailed specifications
N200 and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 144 |
| Threads | 4 | 288 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 390 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
N200 and EPYC 9825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics | N/A |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 32 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N200 and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N200 and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and EPYC 9825.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 128 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2023 | 10 October 2024 |
| Threads | 4 | 288 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 390 Watt |
N200 has 6400% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 7100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between N200 and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9825 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
