EPYC 9375F vs U300

VS

Primary details

Comparing U300 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1193not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency9.01no data
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

U300 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Performance-cores1no data
Efficient-cores4no data
Threads664
Base clock speedno data3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on U300 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1744SP5
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

U300 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267DDR5
Maximum memory size96 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 13th Gen Intel ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of U300 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by U300 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 5 32
Threads 6 64
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 320 Watt

U300 has 481.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 540% more physical cores and 966.7% more threads.

We couldn't decide between U300 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that U300 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between U300 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel U300
U300
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about U300 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.