Celeron 4305UE vs N200
Aggregate performance score
N200 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing N200 and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1610 | 2421 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 50.21 | 6.72 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 1 October 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
N200 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on N200 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | Intel BGA 1528 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| GPIO | + | no data |
Security technologies
N200 and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 32 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096 x 2160@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Celeron 4305UE.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 9 | 16 |
| USB revision | 2.0/3.2 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.20 | 1.07 |
| Integrated graphics card | 5.58 | 1.89 |
| Recency | 1 January 2023 | 1 October 2018 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
N200 has a 199.1% higher aggregate performance score, 195.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.
The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
