Celeron 4305UE vs N100

VS

Aggregate performance score

N100
2023
4 threads, 6 Watt
3.60
+224%

N100 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing N100 and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15332409
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency54.716.75
Architecture codenameno dataWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

N100 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on N100 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264Intel BGA 1528
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

N100 and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 610
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency750 MHzno data
Execution Units24no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N100 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N100 and Celeron 4305UE.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes916
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

N100 3.60
+224%
Celeron 4305UE 1.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

N100 5505
+224%
Celeron 4305UE 1699

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 1.11
Integrated graphics card 5.57 1.89
Recency 1 January 2023 1 October 2018
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

N100 has a 224.3% higher aggregate performance score, 194.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.

The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between N100 and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N100
N100
Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 178 votes

Rate N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about N100 or Celeron 4305UE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.