i9-10880H vs Mobile Sempron SI-42

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron SI-42
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 512 Watt
0.19
Core i9-10880H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 2 Watt
8.08
+4153%

Core i9-10880H outperforms Mobile Sempron SI-42 by a whopping 4153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34951052
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronIntel Comet Lake
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameSable (2008−2009)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate1800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g2FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB2 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 8.08
Recency 1 September 2009 2 April 2020
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 2 Watt

i9-10880H has a 4152.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25500% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core i9-10880H is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron SI-42
Mobile Sempron SI-42
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 15 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron SI-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Sempron SI-42 and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.