Pentium M 738 vs Mobile Sempron SI-40
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron SI-40 outperforms Pentium M 738 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3518 | 3626 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Pentium M |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sable (2008−2009) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 4 July 2008 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 2 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron SI-40 and Pentium M 738. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125V | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 0.12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 2 Watt |
Mobile Sempron SI-40 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 25500% lower power consumption.
The AMD Mobile Sempron SI-40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium M 738 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
