Athlon II M340 vs Mobile Sempron M100
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II M340 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3188 | 2871 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | AMD Athlon II |
| Power efficiency | 0.83 | 1.38 |
| Architecture codename | Caspian (2009) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S | Socket S1 (S1g3) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.22 | 0.51 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Mobile Sempron M100 has a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.
Athlon II M340, on the other hand, has a 131.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Athlon II M340 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron M100 and Athlon II M340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
