Celeron M 340 vs Mobile Sempron 3500+
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron 3500+ outperforms Celeron M 340 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3546 | 3596 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Sempron | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Keene | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron M 340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 400 MHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 512 KB L2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.356V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron M 340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 24.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron M 340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron M 340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3500+ and Celeron M 340 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 24 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 3500+ has a 15.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 340, on the other hand, has 4.2% lower power consumption.
The AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 340 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
