Celeron M 723 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+
Aggregate performance score
Mobile Sempron 3300+ outperforms Celeron M 723 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3508 | 3531 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Intel Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.12 | 1.27 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Roma (2005) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 1 June 2005 (20 years ago) | 1 September 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 723 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 723 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | 745 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62/25 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 723. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Recency | 1 June 2005 | 1 September 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 5 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 3300+ has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score.
Celeron M 723, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1140% lower power consumption.
The AMD Mobile Sempron 3300+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 723 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
