Celeron M 450 vs Mobile Sempron 3300+
General info
Comparing Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Roma (2005) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 1 June 2005 (18 years old) | no data |
| Current price | $15 | $273 |
Technical specs
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.0V-1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | 745 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62/25 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Mobile Sempron 3300+ outperforms Celeron M 450 by 28% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 27 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Celeron M 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
