Core Solo T1300 vs Mobile Sempron 2600+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Sempron | Core Solo |
| Architecture codename | Dublin | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | no data | January 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Current price | $26 | $4.90 |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.66 GHz |
| Bus support | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.1625V - 1.3V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Mobile Sempron 2600+ outperforms Core Solo T1300 by 22% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 27 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 2600+ and Core Solo T1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
