Ryzen 5 9600X vs Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated309
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.02
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data27.59
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Granite Ridge (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data8,315 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataSMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313
Ryzen 5 9600X 30095
+9515%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 9600X, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 9600X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ and Ryzen 5 9600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
Ryzen 5 9600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 128 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 9600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ or Ryzen 5 9600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.