Phenom X4 9750 (95W) vs Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3481not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Agena (2007−2008)
Release dateAugust 2005 (20 years ago)March 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Phenom X4 9750 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data65 nm
Die size193 mm2285 mm2
Number of transistors106 million450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Phenom X4 9750 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)1 MB95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Phenom X4 9750 (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Phenom X4 9750 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Power consumption (TDP) 1 Watt 95 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ has 9400% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9750 (95W), on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9750 (95W) is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
AMD Phenom X4 9750 (95W)
Phenom X4 9750 (95W)

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9750 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ and Phenom X4 9750 (95W), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.