Atom 230 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21
+90.9%
Atom 230
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.11

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ outperforms Atom 230 by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32093362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.322.60
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate800 MHz533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128K56 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data45 nm
Die size193 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors106 million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 0.21
+90.9%
Atom 230 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333
+97%
Atom 230 169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.11
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 4 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ has a 90.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom 230, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 1450% lower power consumption.

The Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.