Athlon 1000 vs Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3209not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.32no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Thunderbird C (2000−2001)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data180 nm
Die size193 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors106 million22 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754A
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt65 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is a notebook processor while Athlon 1000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ and Athlon 1000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
AMD Athlon 1000
Athlon 1000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 35 votes

Rate Athlon 1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ or Athlon 1000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.