Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K768 KB
L2 cache1 MB12 MB
L3 cacheno data64 MB
Chip lithographyno data5 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors106 million9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754FL1
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen 9 7840HX has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and 12.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
Ryzen 9 7840HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 9 7840HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ or Ryzen 9 7840HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.