Ultra 9 288V vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data38.80
Architecture codenameNewark (2003)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache128K192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data3 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ 326
Ultra 9 288V 19542
+5894%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 30 Watt

Ultra 9 288V has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.