Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE vs Mobile Athlon 64 3200+
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3477 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Mobile Athlon 64 | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.13 | no data |
Designer | AMD | AMD |
Architecture codename | Newark (2003) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
Release date | August 2003 (22 years ago) | May 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128K | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | no data | 90 nm |
Die size | 193 mm2 | 220 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 106 million | 154 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 754 | AM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4000+ EE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.