Xeon w7-2575X vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated75
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data69.67
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data14.63
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,689

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data45 MB
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450
Xeon w7-2575X 61402
+13545%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 22
Threads 1 44
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-2575X, on the other hand, has 2100% more physical cores and 4300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-2575X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon w7-2575X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Xeon w7-2575X
Xeon w7-2575X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-2575X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Xeon w7-2575X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.