Ultra 9 285K vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.28
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024
24 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
43.04
+15271%

Core Ultra 9 285K outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 15271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking313154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.7632.56
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads124
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz250 MHz
L1 cache128K112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data3 nm
Die size193 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors106 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4K @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 8K @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data4K @ 60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data8K @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 0.28
Ultra 9 285K 43.04
+15271%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450
Ultra 9 285K 68370
+15093%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 43.04
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 24
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has a 15271.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 285K is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 168 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.